All genera of the world: Order Scorpiones (Animalia: Arthropoda: Arachnida)

  All genera of the world: Order Scorpiones (Animalia: Arthropoda: Arachnida) Abstract The present contribution provides a consensus classification of the arachnid Order Scorpiones C.L. Koch, 1850, and updates the counts of extant and extinct genera and species through the end of 2025. Including the revisions implemented herein, there are 459 genus-group names available in Scorpiones by the end of 2025. Of these, 318 refer to currently accepted extant genera (220), subfossil genera (1) and extinct genera (97). Fifty-four genus-group names are newly synonymized, raising to 145 the number in synonymy, whereas sixteen genus-group names are revalidated and/or newly elevated to the rank of genus. Including the revisions implemented herein, Scorpiones includes 3,089 currently accepted species-group names (2,918 extant species, 1 subfossil species, and 170 extinct species) and 22 nomina dubia. Forty-seven species-group names are newly synonymized, whereas 43 species-group names are revali...

Spiders in the mosaic: How habitat heterogeneity and structure drive local spider diversity in a Mediterranean forest

 


Spiders in the mosaic: How habitat heterogeneity and structure drive local spider diversity in a Mediterranean forest

Abstract

  1. Addressing biodiversity loss requires knowing how different living beings are spatially distributed. For hyper-diverse groups such as spiders, biogeographic dispersal-related processes tend to be the main factor driving diversity patterns at large spatial scales, while the relevance of ecological filtering (species sorting) may increase at lower spatial scales.
  2. To determine how spider diversity and structure are shaped at local spatial scales, we sampled spider communities using a standardized optimized protocol and assessed habitat heterogeneity across 10 Mediterranean forest plots in the Northeastern Iberian Peninsula. We compared the spiders' composition and structure among forest types and across vegetation layers using generalized linear models and linear mixed models for assessing patterns of alpha-diversity and constrained ordination analyses for understanding beta-diversity patterns.
  3. Across forests, habitat heterogeneity was the only significant driver for structuring alpha- and beta-diversity, and the geographic and climate distance explained a low variance of the models. Pine forests were separated in the redundancy analyses from holm oak and deciduous forests because a lower vegetation cover characterized the latter. Lineal models of alpha-diversity at the microhabitat scale only showed significant negative tendencies for the rock cover. Beta-diversity across vegetation layers within a plot and across forests appears to be influenced primarily by habitat heterogeneity, particularly by the presence of herbaceous and low shrub cover.
  4. Our results highlight the importance of species sorting over biogeography and climatic variables in shaping spider diversity patterns at the local scale. They also indicate that a mosaic of habitat structure within and between forest types is a significant driver of spider diversity. These findings have implications for assessing spider assemblages—and likely other arthropods—suggesting that a combination of methods capturing microhabitat descriptors is crucial for effective monitoring schemes.
Marquerie-Córdoba, M., Múrria, C., Ramos, C., Sánchez, A., Sevil, A., García, A. E., Puig-Gironès, R., Real, J., & Arnedo, M. A. Spiders in the mosaic: How habitat heterogeneity and structure drive local spider diversity in a Mediterranean forest. Ecological Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/een.70093